Frogs Have Rights?

Those little green amphibians that so often unsuccessfully attempt to cross the road (hopping) have a group of confused students fighting for their rights. Could froggy stop-lights around ponds, marshes, and swamps you drive near be far away?

Two Connecticut teens are fighting to remove frogs and other animals, used in biology class to discover how the human body works, out of the classroom. Citing froggy rights, Mary Sheppard and Rachel Matos are hoping to stop dissections of frogs in the classroom in hopes of computerized dissections, which doesn't give young future doctors any kind of practical experience in high schools across the country.

There is a reason why animals are used in the classroom. They not only provide a model, but they also provide an environment where students are required to follow direction while providing textures and microscope samples a computer can possibly provide.

These two students are letting the pathos of cruelty drive their petition drive. When I was in biology, the frogs were already dead; therefore there was no cruelty in the classroom. As well, they were gassed and didn't feel a thing.

Perhaps these two students will consider all the advancements we have made not only in human medicine but in veterinary medicine that helps both man and beast live longer, as now they are being used by smut peddlers PETA, the Hustler (Larry Flynt) of wacky liberal causes.